Aza Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 At present I have a djm600. With the impressive release and amazing features of the 909 I have been wondering lately whether it is worth it/should I have got the 909. There is roughly £100 difference, but do you really think the features and benefits are worth it? I have yet to try it out, but the potential looks amazing. The 909 looks extremely well built and advanced. It has 2 channels where as the djm600 has 4. I dont think I need all four though. What are thoughts/advise? Cheers in advance if you can help Quote
Quadrant Posted February 18, 2006 Posted February 18, 2006 Stick with the 600. It's got more channels and it does the job... why change for the sake of change? :wink: Quote
Aza Posted February 18, 2006 Author Posted February 18, 2006 Just looking to get the best and also latest (up to date). Ive decided to stick with the 600 anyways mate. Im gonna save up a bit and buy a kamcase and stick all instruments in there neat and tidy Quote
Uberduck Posted February 23, 2006 Posted February 23, 2006 I debated this over xmas when I bought my 600. We had a fairly lengthy thread about the topic. The general consensus seemed the 600 is the way forward. As the 909 is aimed at the scratch market it obviously only features the two channels. Would be a possible contender if it featured the recording and edit capabilities but with more channels. Hence the reason why the 600 is probably more suitable for general mixing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.