thirddrive Posted June 21, 2005 Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 Still with some swooshyness, hopefully will be able to improve quality with some tweaking. So here's my interpretation of the track: http://www.judgejulesarchive.co.uk/audio/J..._H_re-edit).wma Does it improve the track? i think it makes it far easier to play out, and then mix out of the breakdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonB Posted June 21, 2005 Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 I like it more than the full length version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thirddrive Posted June 22, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 Tidied it up a bit now, and sent it to Jules. it's now in 192kps, just about the same standard of the original. Also, someone from the JJ.net board has asked to hear it too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neuro Posted June 22, 2005 Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 Did you get my PM and manage to eliminate the swishing sound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thirddrive Posted June 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 yes i did get it thanks, and I think that the whole WMA thing was the problem! I made sure that a codec or something was in place so I could actually save to MP3, then had to re-do it. Saved at 192 et viola! Much better for playing out. And less annoying in your earphones!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.